Voices in the Wind

A daily market update from FS Insight — what you need to know ahead of opening bell.

“The ability to simplify means to eliminate the unnecessary so that the necessary may speak.” – Hans Hofmann

Over the Weekend

All 80 on board safe after Delta plane flips over on landing at Toronto FT

US and Russia begin bilateral talks in Saudi Arabia over ending Ukraine war SEM

Homeland Security preparing political firings for hundreds of senior leaders this week CNBC

Social Security head steps down over DOGE access of recipient information, sources say AP

Musk’s xAI releases artificial intelligence model Grok 3, claims better performance than rivals in early testing CNBC

US government struggling to rehire nuclear arsenal staff it fired days ago BBC

Hundreds fired at aviation safety agency, union says BBC

JPMorgan axed about nine workers in Paris for ‘economic reasons’ BBG

DeepSeek ‘shared user data’ with TikTok owner ByteDance: South Korean officials BBC

Argentina’s President Javier Milei faces fraud probe over cryptocurrency crash SEM

New York governor weighs removing NYC mayor with City Hall in crisis BBG

Humpback whale briefly swallows kayaker in Chilean Patagonia — and it’s all captured on camera AP

Chart of the Day

Voices in the Wind
Overnight
S&P Futures +22 point(s) (+0.4% )
overnight range: -1 to +25 point(s)
 
APAC
Nikkei +0.25%
Topix +0.31%
China SHCOMP -0.93%
Hang Seng +1.59%
Korea +0.63%
Singapore +0.53%
Australia -0.66%
India -0.06%
Taiwan +0.68%
 
Europe
Stoxx 50 +0.15%
Stoxx 600 +0.14%
FTSE 100 +0.04%
DAX -0.05%
CAC 40 +0.07%
Italy +0.55%
IBEX +0.58%
 
FX
Dollar Index (DXY) +0.38% to 106.98
EUR/USD -0.24% to 1.0459
GBP/USD -0.28% to 1.2590
USD/JPY -0.22% to 151.84
USD/CNY -0.22% to 7.2800
USD/CNH -0.22% to 7.2826
USD/CHF -0.14% to 0.9020
USD/CAD -0.11% to 1.4199
AUD/USD -0.09% to 0.6350
 
UST Term Structure
2Y-3 M Spread widened 2.1bps to -4.5bps
10Y-2 Y Spread widened 2.0bps to 23.3bps
30Y-10 Y Spread narrowed -0.4bps to 21.4bps
 
Yesterday's Recap
SPX -0.01%
SPX Eq Wt -0.10%
NASDAQ 100 +0.38%
NASDAQ Comp +0.41%
Russell Midcap -0.01%
R2k -0.10%
R1k Value -0.14%
R1k Growth +0.11%
R2k Value -0.09%
R2k Growth -0.11%
FANG+ +0.30%
Semis +0.26%
Software +0.08%
Biotech +0.71%
Regional Banks +0.31% SPX GICS1 Sorted: Cons Staples -1.16%
Healthcare -1.11%
Utes -0.51%
REITs -0.44%
Materials -0.33%
Indu -0.29%
Cons Disc -0.27%
SPX -0.01%
Energy +0.13%
Fin +0.14%
Comm Srvcs +0.41%
Tech +0.60%
 
USD HY OaS
All Sectors +11.3bps to 309bps
All Sectors ex-Energy +5.9bps 289bps
Cons Disc +40.4bps 276bps
Indu +1.8bps 221bps
Tech +3.2bps 304bps
Comm Srvcs +3.0bps 497bps
Materials +2.3bps 269bps
Energy -0.4bps 291bps
Fin Snr +1.9bps 258bps
Fin Sub +2.0bps 203bps
Cons Staples +5.9bps 287bps
Healthcare +3.6bps 356bps
Utes +1.4bps 222bps *
DateTimeDescriptionEstimateLast
2/1810:00 AMFeb Homebuilder Sentiment4647
2/184:00 PMDec Net TIC Flowsn/a159.888
2/192:00 PMJan 29 FOMC Minutesn/a0
2/192:00 PMJan 29 FOMC Minutesn/a0
2/219:45 AMFeb P S&P Manu PMI51.251.2
2/219:45 AMFeb P S&P Srvcs PMI5352.9
2/2110:00 AMFeb F UMich 1yr Inf Expn/a4.3
2/2110:00 AMFeb F UMich Sentiment67.867.8
2/2110:00 AMJan Existing Home Sales4.134.24
2/2110:00 AMJan Existing Home Sales m/m-2.592.17

MORNING INSIGHT

Good morning!

Last week we saw a collapse in retail sentiment (AAII, American Association of Individual Investors), which has historically been a reliable signal of strong forward returns.

Click HERE for more.

TECHNICAL

  • We got a very good breakout in both S&P 500 and QQQ, coinciding with a big breakdown in the U.S. dollar.
  • With regard to the S&P 500, we did in fact break out of the consolidation from January.
  • In my view, the market showed its hand last week, and I think even if we see some minor backing and filling, the direction has now turned to bullish from sideways or neutral.

Click HERE for more. 

CRYPTO

The key takeaways from last week involve an underwhelming flow picture and BTC’s relationship with various equity benchmarks. We’ll also explore why gold is outperforming BTC and the significance of the staked ETH ETFs.

Click HERE for more. 

First News

Shareholder activism is in the news these days. Corporations are tired of it. Last year, ExxonMobile sued two investors after they filed shareholder petitions regarding the energy company’s climate-change risks, withdrawing it only after they agreed to not to do so again. JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon has publicly criticized the concept of shareholder meetings altogether, depicting them as a “frivolous waste of time.”

Current regulations mandate that all U.S. publicly traded companies must hold annual shareholder meetings, and any shareholder with a stake of $2,000 or more can submit proposals to be voted on at the meeting. Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 lists 13 broadly stated reasons why the SEC will allow a company to exclude a submitted proposal from shareholder vote (along with rules governing whether a previously rejected proposal is eligible for resubmission). 

Shareholder activism is hardly a new trend. In fact, it dates back at least to the early 1600s, when the Dutch East India Company found itself locking horns with Isaac Le Maire, its largest shareholder at the time. But this latest wave of antipathy arguably stems from years of ESG activism – when investors (inspired and encouraged by a group of global financial institutions who coined the ESG acronym in the 2004 United Nations report “Who Cares Wins“) – began pushing companies to consider environmental, social, and governance impacts in their operations and arguing that doing so would have both reputational and material benefits for shareholders. This progressive-leaning trend unsurprisingly spurred a conservative backlash in which right-leaning activists took a page from the ESG playbook

Perhaps understandably, executives and corporate boards see all this as a headache – and a costly one. Under the second Trump administration, the SEC appears to be listening. The regulator last week issued guidance about how it plans to interpret Rule 14a-8, stating that “proposals that raise issues of social or ethical significance may be excludable, notwithstanding their importance in the abstract.”

That might not be good news for activists on either side of the divide. Although progressives hardly have a particularly stellar record of getting proposals passed as it is, conservatives are arguably faring even worse, despite having ramped up their anti-ESG or anti-DEI brand of shareholder activism in the past two years. Even before the SEC guidance, ESG activists had mostly left the party, no longer convinced that shareholder returns are strongly correlated with doing good. Their conservative counterparts might have a different idea of what “doing good” entails, but with the SEC making it more difficult for activists motivated by culture wars, they might well come to the same conclusion soon enough.

Disclosures (show)

Sign in to read the report!

We have detected you are an active member!

Ray: 8f82f6-239ca0-f60007-96e269-352570

Want to receive Regular Market Updates to your Inbox?

I am your default error :)

Events

Trending tickers in our research