Consumer Discretionary breakout vs. Consumer Staples is seen as positive

Key Takeaways
  • Short-term consolidation likely complete by end of week.
  • Consumer Discretionary has broken out vs. Consumer Staples which signals “Risk-on”.
  • Software ETF (IGV) should be watched carefully for signs of a coming breakout.
Consumer Discretionary breakout vs. Consumer Staples is seen as positive

Short-term US Equity trends have still grinded largely sideways in recent weeks following the bullish breakout back to new all-time highs for SPX and DJIA.   Despite minor weakness following the escalation in the Middle East in recent days, Equities have failed to show much real deterioration, and breadth remains near the highs of the year.  While the back half of October might prove more volatile than the first half, recent sideways consolidation does not seem indicative of that which might kick off any type of real selloff, despite all the negative headlines globally.  Overall, without evidence of any serious technical damage, it’s difficult turning too negative on US equity markets.  I expect that the Rosh Hashanah/Yom Kipper cycle very well might invert this year, leading to strength into Yom Kippur, not vice versa.

Similar to yesterday’s comments, despite some minor selling pressure this past week, S&P remains within 1% of all-time highs made just three trading days ago (9/30/24).  Breadth has proven solid in recent weeks, and momentum and technical structure continue to be in good shape.  Technology has “taken the back seat” in recent weeks to strength seen out of Industrials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary.

Yet, Technology has not materially weakened enough to suggest that any sort of peak is happening within the sector.  Incidentally, stocks like AAPL show beautiful bullish triangle patterns, while the Software ETF (IGV) is on the verge of its own breakout back to new all-time highs. (Stocks like CRM and ORCL are particularly positive here technically).

As shown below, S&P’s sideways grind as seen on hourly charts over the last two weeks.  This pattern is not particularly bullish just yet, but more neutral, until SPX can reclaim 5720. 

However, the choppiness of the pattern along with the resilience in holding at/near Tuesday’s intra-day lows is encouraging.  Despite the plethora of negative news globally, indices seem to be holding up relatively well and are not accelerating lower.  Thus, this makes a good case for a bottom either Friday or early next week at/near 5660 and max near 5628.  Conversely, as discussed briefly above, movement above 5720 would help to improve the SPX pattern.

Given that stocks like MSFT, AMZN, AAPL, along with the SOX index, have all made minor pullbacks which have not shown technical damage from the lows in August, it’s likely that this consolidation stabilizes and starts to turn higher early next week.

S&P 500 Index

Consumer Discretionary breakout vs. Consumer Staples is seen as positive
Source: Bloomberg

Consumer Discretionary breakout vs. Consumer Staples still favors a Risk-on stance  

As might have been expected, the big bounce in Chinese Equities over the last two weeks served to positively influence many Casino names, along with some isolated Retailing names like EBAY and Ralph Lauren.  Homebuilders/Home Construction names have also benefitted lately, largely as the FOMC began its Rate cutting campaign and HD, PHM, and LOW are three of the top 10 performers this past month within Consumer Discretionary (“Discretionary”).

As seen below, this relationship between Discretionary and the Consumer Staples (“Staples”) sector seems to be an important one that normally can give clues about whether markets are in “risk-on”, or “risk-off” type environments.

As seen on the left-hand side of this ratio chart of Equal-weighted Discretionary vs. Equal-weighted Staples, this relationship starts to turn down sharply as the Stock market begins larger corrections.  (This ratio turned down about two months prior to SPX making its bull market peak during the first week of January 2022).

This might make some intuitive sense, as investors flock towards safety, and Staples outperforms Discretionary.

Recently, this ratio is still signaling that our current US Stock market is favoring more of a “risk-on” type environment, as Discretionary has broken out to new multi-year highs vs. Staples in the last couple of weeks.

I find this gauge helpful during times when markets are jittery, looking at relationships between Discretionary and Staples.  The good news for stock market Bulls lately is that Discretionary remains a relative outperformer vs. the Staples sector and looks to continue outperforming to potentially challenge former peaks last reached in late 2021.

NYSEMKT:RSPD – NYSEMKT: RSPS

Consumer Discretionary breakout vs. Consumer Staples is seen as positive
Source:  Symbolik

Software could represent the next major breakout within Technology

Many investors paid attention when Semiconductor stocks were showing superior relative strength over the past year.  While this waned a bit in recent months, the attention now seems to be shifting towards Software names.

As seen below, the IGV (Ishares Tech-expanded Software ETF) has been straddling near all-time high territory for the last few months following a successful retest of all-time highs into July.

This pattern remains quite bullish, as a large Cup and Handle pattern, technically speaking.

I anticipate a coming breakout, which will be confirmed on a daily close above $90.  Such a development would argue for a quick move up to $100 and the Software sector remains one to concentrate on which might lead Technology once this breakout happens.

Stocks like CRM, ORCL, PLTR, and APP are particularly attractive within the IGV etf, technically speaking.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF

Consumer Discretionary breakout vs. Consumer Staples is seen as positive
Source:  TradingView

Technology’s sideways churn has been led by stocks like NVDA and AAPL, both within Triangle patterns

Technology has slowed somewhat in the last couple months, but has not shown sufficient deterioration to avoid this sector.   Many index/ETF dominant names like NVDA and AAPL remain in Triangle patterns which are thought to be resolved by upside breakouts in the weeks to come.

At a combined 10% of SPX, the consolidation in both NVDA and AAPL within Triangle patterns is at least part of the reason for a bit of slowdown in the Tech trade lately. 

As seen, this triangle pattern requires a move above 126.50 for a breakout (and this should be the likely outcome) and today’s rally to multi-day highs has provided a bit of a short-term relative spark for Technology.While Equal-weighted Tech is just fractionally negative (-0.08%), XLK is up +0.55%, due largely to NVDA, PLTR, AMD, CRWD, and MU outperformance, all of which finished higher by more than 2%. 

Bottom line, NVDA looks appealing here ahead of its breakout, and movement above 126.50 should result in acceleration that leads this back to new highs, technically. 

NVDA US Equity (NVIDIA CORP) Daily

Consumer Discretionary breakout vs. Consumer Staples is seen as positive
Source: Bloomberg
Disclosures (show)

This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. FSI Subscription entitles the subscriber to 1 user, research cannot be shared or redistributed. For additional information, please contact your sales representative or FS Insight at fsinsight.com.

Analyst Certification (Reg AC)
Mark L. Newton, CMT, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report, hereby certifies that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his personal views, which have not been influenced by considerations of the firm’s business or client relationships. Neither I, nor a member of my household is an officer, director, or advisory board member of the issuer(s) or has another significant affiliation with the issuer(s) that is/are the subject of this research report. There is a possibility that we will from time to time have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research.
Conflicts of Interest

This research contains the views, opinions and recommendations of FS Insight. At the time of publication of this report, FS Insight does not know of, or have reason to know of any material conflicts of interest.

General Disclosures

FS Insight is an independent research company and is not a registered investment advisor and is not acting as a broker dealer under any federal or state securities laws.

FS Insight is a member of IRC Securities’ Research Prime Services Platform. IRC Securities is a FINRA registered broker-dealer that is focused on supporting the independent research industry. Certain personnel of FS Insight (i.e. Research Analysts) are registered representatives of IRC Securities, a FINRA member firm registered as a broker-dealer with the Securities and Exchange Commission and certain state securities regulators. As registered representatives and independent contractors of IRC Securities, such personnel may receive commissions paid to or shared with IRC Securities for transactions placed by FS Insight clients directly with IRC Securities or with securities firms that may share commissions with IRC Securities in accordance with applicable SEC and FINRA requirements. IRC Securities does not distribute the research of FS Insight, which is available to select institutional clients that have engaged FS Insight.

As registered representatives of IRC Securities our analysts must follow IRC Securities’ Written Supervisory Procedures. Notable compliance policies include (1) prohibition of insider trading or the facilitation thereof, (2) maintaining client confidentiality, (3) archival of electronic communications, and (4) appropriate use of electronic communications, amongst other compliance related policies.

FS Insight does not have the same conflicts that traditional sell-side research organizations have because FS Insight (1) does not conduct any investment banking activities, and (2) does not manage any investment funds.

This communication is issued by FS Insight and/or affiliates of FS Insight. This is not a personal recommendation, nor an offer to buy or sell nor a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial instruments or services. This material is distributed for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting or investment advice.
The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.
Intended for recipient only and not for further distribution without the consent of FS Insight.

This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but FS Insight does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to FS Insight and the analyst’s involvement (if any) with any of the subject companies of the research. All pricing is as of the market close for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, risk tolerance, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decision regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. Except in circumstances where FS Insight expressly agrees otherwise in writing, FS Insight is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice, including within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client website, fsinsight.com. Not all research content is redistributed to our clients or made available to third-party aggregators or the media. Please contact your sales representative if you would like to receive any of our research publications.

Copyright © 2025 FS Insight LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the prior written consent of FS Insight LLC.