Attractive areas within Consumer Discretionary to consider

Key Takeaways
  • SPX and QQQ should push higher into CPI report and potentially into next week
  • XLY has hit the highest levels since 2022, thanks to AMZN and TSLA performance
  • Equal-wgtd Cons. Discretionary has proven to be far more neutral, but good vs Staples
Attractive areas within Consumer Discretionary to consider

US Equity trends remain bullish and mildly overbought after this recent early July run-up, and it remains difficult to fade SPX or QQQ ahead of this week’s all-important CPI report.  Minor evidence of strength is apparent from Consumer Discretionary, Financials, Industrials and Materials, but still largely hasn’t proven broad-based enough to suggest a bigger period of outperformance from these groups has gotten underway.  Overall, cycles, seasonality, and ongoing strength in Technology argues for a bullish stance in US Equities into at least mid-July before some backing and filling.  SPX targets could materialize initially between 5600-5700.

Tuesday failed to bring about much change in near-term trends in US Equities from a broader index level, and until price can retreat to violate last week’s lows (approximately 5446 in ^SPX) it’s right to continue to expect higher Equity prices as well as higher Treasury prices (anticipating a pullback in Treasury yields).

There looks to be important resistance directly above over the next 4-6 trading days, which might lead indices higher into next week’s expiration ahead of late July weakness.  This would align with July seasonality, and might bring about some consolidation in late July ahead of yet another runup into late August/early September.

I’ll forego any lengthy short-term analysis on SPX until there is some evidence of trend change, and/or price gets up above 5600 or below 5446.   For now, it’s increasingly important to show the divergences in some of the main S&P 500 sectors when looking at these on an Equal-weighted basis.

Consumer Discretionary is a prime example, as this sector’s cap-weighted ETF (XLY- SPDR S&P Select Consumer Discretionary ETF) has now shown better performance than all other 10 sectors that make up the S&P 500 over the last week.  Moreover, this now is 2nd best of any of the major 11 over the last month.

Importantly, I should stress that AMZN, TSLA and HD make up more than 50% of the XLY, making this ETF a largely flawed gauge towards measuring true Discretionary performance.

However, this doesn’t translate into XLY not being able to go higher, and XLY’s push to new two-year highs is seen as a bullish development.  Furthermore, this still looks to be able to show further strength.  Until/unless this were to breach $185, XLY looks quite positive following last week’s move to the highest levels of 2024.

Any minor consolidation in XLY should still lead to buying opportunities into August/early September, and XLY might be able to push higher to $200.

Attractive areas within Consumer Discretionary to consider
Source: Trading View

Equal-weighted Consumer Discretionary looks quite choppy and range-bound

The recent slowdown in Retail and Consumer Durables stocks has resulted in “Discretionary” appearing far more range-bound, and neutral technically speaking.

The differences in performance between RCD to XLY are fairly pronounced, with RSPD having returned +0.38% over the past week compared to a +3.48% return on XLY.

Meanwhile, over the last month, the difference is even greater, as RSPD was down by -1.64%, while XLY returned +6.60%. 

Thus, for investors who care about Discretionary performance, it’s necessary to view this sector in Equal-weighted terms, as shown below. 

Price of RCD (Invesco’s Equal-weighted Consumer Discretionary ETF) has pulled back to three-month area of trendline support, and it’s right technically to view this sector as an attractive short-term risk/reward given the ability of price having held at this important level.

However, rallies into August/September likely would warrant my technically neutral rating being lowered, as the disappointment out of groups like Retailing, and Durables make Discretionary a difficult sector to consider as an Overweight.

Furthermore, any evidence of recent economic weakness continuing might also translate into a more difficult final few months of the year for Discretionary, in a time that’s normally proven quite sub-par and potentially volatile ahead of the US Election.

Attractive areas within Consumer Discretionary to consider
Source:  Trading View

Retailing looks choppy and mixed, and selectivity is important in this sub-industry

Weakness in SPDR S&P Retail ETF, or XRT, is largely trading at similar levels as it did back in December 2023.

While I do expect that $72-$72.50 can provide support for XRT and help this turn higher, it could prove to be a difficult area to have much confidence in until it begins to show much better signs of strength.

Given that selectivity remains important within Retailing sector at this time, I prefer stocks like the following, from a technical perspective:  ANF, WMT, ORLY, AGYS, NSIT, BURL, OLLI, SFM, COST, CASY, NGVC, AZO, and TJX.

However, one should concentrate on stocks within striking distance of 52-week highs, vs. attempting to buy laggards in this group, in my view. The daily XRT chart is shown below.

Attractive areas within Consumer Discretionary to consider
Source:  Trading View

Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF looks far better technically

For those looking for areas within Discretionary which might show outperformance outside of Retailing, one might seek Restaurants, Hotels, Cruise-liners, and/or booking agencies.

Invesco’s PEJ (ETF) covers Leisure and Entertainment, and it’s top 10 holdings are HLT, RCL, BKNG, ABNB, DPZ, SYY, CMG, WBD, CNK, and SKYW and each of these holdings comprises between 3-5% of the PEJ (ETF).

As can be seen, PEJ looks far superior to XRT technically speaking, and is also much more diversified than XLY.  I expect this should be able to push higher to $45 in the months to come.

Attractive areas within Consumer Discretionary to consider
Source:  Bloomberg

Discretionary vs. Staples still looks to be in good shape

One of the main gauges for risk appetite that many investors watch is the ratio of Discretionary to Staples, shown below in Equal-weighted form.

The idea behind this is that if Discretionary is outperforming, such a move likely happens during “risk-on” periods, while an uptick in Defensiveness tends to happen as market selloffs grow closer and/or are ongoing.

As shown below, the ratio of RCD to RHS remains upward sloping and bullish, and this still should be able to carry higher into this Fall before finding much resistance.

The minor stalling out seen near early Spring peaks looks innocuous and should prove temporary ahead of further strength out of Discretionary.

Overall, I expect that Cruise-liners along with Retail and Consumer Durables can likely begin to show some strength over the next couple months and this could help the broader Discretionary sector show a bit better relative strength than what’s happened in recent months.

However, on any test of 2021 peaks, I expect a stalling out, as this level signifies meaningful upside resistance.

Attractive areas within Consumer Discretionary to consider
Source: Symbolik
Disclosures (show)

This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. FSI Subscription entitles the subscriber to 1 user, research cannot be shared or redistributed. For additional information, please contact your sales representative or FS Insight at fsinsight.com.

Analyst Certification (Reg AC)
Mark L. Newton, CMT, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report, hereby certifies that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his personal views, which have not been influenced by considerations of the firm’s business or client relationships. Neither I, nor a member of my household is an officer, director, or advisory board member of the issuer(s) or has another significant affiliation with the issuer(s) that is/are the subject of this research report. There is a possibility that we will from time to time have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research.
Conflicts of Interest

This research contains the views, opinions and recommendations of FS Insight. At the time of publication of this report, FS Insight does not know of, or have reason to know of any material conflicts of interest.

General Disclosures

FS Insight is an independent research company and is not a registered investment advisor and is not acting as a broker dealer under any federal or state securities laws.

FS Insight is a member of IRC Securities’ Research Prime Services Platform. IRC Securities is a FINRA registered broker-dealer that is focused on supporting the independent research industry. Certain personnel of FS Insight (i.e. Research Analysts) are registered representatives of IRC Securities, a FINRA member firm registered as a broker-dealer with the Securities and Exchange Commission and certain state securities regulators. As registered representatives and independent contractors of IRC Securities, such personnel may receive commissions paid to or shared with IRC Securities for transactions placed by FS Insight clients directly with IRC Securities or with securities firms that may share commissions with IRC Securities in accordance with applicable SEC and FINRA requirements. IRC Securities does not distribute the research of FS Insight, which is available to select institutional clients that have engaged FS Insight.

As registered representatives of IRC Securities our analysts must follow IRC Securities’ Written Supervisory Procedures. Notable compliance policies include (1) prohibition of insider trading or the facilitation thereof, (2) maintaining client confidentiality, (3) archival of electronic communications, and (4) appropriate use of electronic communications, amongst other compliance related policies.

FS Insight does not have the same conflicts that traditional sell-side research organizations have because FS Insight (1) does not conduct any investment banking activities, and (2) does not manage any investment funds.

This communication is issued by FS Insight and/or affiliates of FS Insight. This is not a personal recommendation, nor an offer to buy or sell nor a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial instruments or services. This material is distributed for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting or investment advice.
The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.
Intended for recipient only and not for further distribution without the consent of FS Insight.

This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but FS Insight does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to FS Insight and the analyst’s involvement (if any) with any of the subject companies of the research. All pricing is as of the market close for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, risk tolerance, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decision regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. Except in circumstances where FS Insight expressly agrees otherwise in writing, FS Insight is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice, including within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client website, fsinsight.com. Not all research content is redistributed to our clients or made available to third-party aggregators or the media. Please contact your sales representative if you would like to receive any of our research publications.

Copyright © 2025 FS Insight LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the prior written consent of FS Insight LLC.