ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

We publish on a 3-day a week schedule:

– SKIP MONDAY due to Labor Day holiday
– SKIP TUESDAY
– Wednesday
– SKIP THURSDAY
– Friday

There is a lot trepidation about markets in September. The seasonals worry investors (one of the toughest months), coupled with midterm election uncertainties (not resolved until November) and the painful three-week downtrend in stocks adding to the misery.

Stocks are approaching the “no bid” situation seen in June 2022. In investor conversation after conversation, many tell us they see little upside in stocks because:

  • Fed just told us the bar is pretty high before they consider a pivot
  • Inflation needs to make considerable progress towards “2%” range
  • Labor markets are still tight, so further economic slowing needed
  • Europe is about to enter a recession
  • China zero-COVID wreaking havoc
  • Russia still toying with global energy supplies
  • Above all, earnings are set to fall (by unknown magnitude)

This is a considerable list of concerns. And we are not blind to these issues. But the first 3 really matter most to US equities. Europe’s economic trajectory is uncertain, but economic weakness there primarily transmits to the US as lower inflation. Similarly, China’s situation has mixed impact by impacting the supply chain, but the suppression of demand is also disinflationary.

The BLS will release August payrolls on Friday. And given the above list of concerns, investors want a downside reading:

  • consensus looking for 300k and +0.4% avg hourly earnings growth MoM
  • bad news is good news
  • as investors prefer to see labor slowing
  • which gets Fed closer to its goals
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact
Source: Bloomberg

JOLTS ILLUSION: Is remote work creating same job posting in multiple cities?

Payrolls have been growing solidly in 2022, and the robustness of the labor market has been surprising, given the collective slowdown seen across the economy. And this of course, is the reason for the Fed to take further action.

  • the July JOLTS (released 8/30) showed job openings rose to 11.2 million
  • markets were alarmed by the rise in job openings, as this is counter to what the Fed wants to see
  • a well regarded economist, suggests this high level of opening might be illusory
  • he notes (below) that because of remote work, a job can be posted in multiple cities
  • while JOLTS attempts to isolate this, by surveying companies (random sample), we wonder how well this is filtered
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact
Source: Jeff Walker, founder of Deep Macro

Here is an example of a series of job postings by TTEC from indeed.com. There are multiple listings for this particular job:

  • it is posted in multiple localities
  • and it is listed as a “remote USA” position
  • what we don’t know if this type of multiple listing is a meaningful share of the job openings overall
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact
Source: indeed.com

And there are even Reddit.com users asking about these multiple positings. As they see a job listed in different cities.

ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact
Source: reddit.com

WHERE IS EVERYBODY? Employed to population ratio still 120bp, 3.7 million fewer employed vs pre-pandemic

There are many who cite total employed Americans is back to pre-pandemic levels. But this ignores the population of Americans age 16-plus has risen 6.4 million since the end of 2019:

  • Since end of 2019 to now
  • Increase in US population age 16-plus +6.4 million
  • Increase US employed age 16-plus +0.0 million
  • Employed to population now 60.0% vs 61.2% end of 2019

As seen below, the employed to population ratio has stalled. This is what is creating the tight labor market. As noted above, this would represent 6.4 million additional workers if the ratio was back to its 2019 levels. Why this is happening has multiple explanations from pandemic disability, early retirements, etc.

  • But this shows the US ultimately has sufficient “theoretical” labor supply
  • and if participation rate recovered
  • labor conditions would not be so tight
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

ISM PRICES FALLING LIKE A ROCK: This could portend PPI falling to 0% in a few months

But labor is not the only issue the Fed is grappling with. The equal foe is inflation.

The August ISM Manufacturing had a big surprise on the prices component. (ISM is a diffusion index where respondents provide one of 3 answers, higher, lower, same and this is leveled at 50).

  • the “prices paid” component was a downside 52.5 vs 55.3 consensus and 60.0 last month
  • this figure has fallen like a rock in the past few months to the lowest reading since July 2020
  • this is also below the 70-year average value of 62.3
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

ISM Prices tends to lead PPI…0% PPI?

Not surprisingly, there is a relationship between ISM “prices paid” and the Producers Price Index (PPI). Take a look below:

  • this chart shows the last 25 years, or since 1997
  • ISM prices paid and PPI are closely linked
  • and this drop in ISM prices paid suggests a sharp drop in PPI is coming
  • PPI for July was 15.5%
  • but this could fall towards 0% in the next few months?
  • that is inflation “falling like a rock”
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

Regional PMIs show prices are falling…

The message from regional PMIs point to this same trend. So this is not some mathematical fluke.

ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

OIL WAY BELOW CONSENSUS FORECASTS: Another major development is the breakdown in oil

Oil prices fell further this week towards $86 and now well below the pre-Russia-Ukraine price of $92:

  • oil is now falling at the fastest pace in 2022 as shown by 3m rolling change (lower chart)
  • oil is within reach of falling to start of 2022 levels, or no gain for 2022
  • rising energy prices has been a major driver of the rise in CPI and core services
  • this breakdown would amplify the “disinflation” tailwinds
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

Oil was expected to hit $140 or higher this summer due to “peak demand” not crash to $86

Take a look at the CNN article from early June 2022. This is typical of many stories in early June:

  • Wall Street warned that oil would rise to $140 or more by September
  • due to summer peak demand
  • along with Russia-Ukraine war
  • we are at September now
  • war is still ongoing
  • we are past peak driving season
  • yet oil is $86

Why matter? Due to business expansion, inflation and expectations, a lot of forecasts on oil price were around $140. The point of this is:

  • all those proclaiming high inflation into 2023 and beyond
  • and the idea of inflation would be sticky and work its way through
  • was based upon oil rising to $140 or higher
  • recall, these forecasts were made in June 2022… we are now in September
  • by contrast, inflation-swap markets show far less inflation into 2023 and beyond
  • yet many economists carry far higher inflation forecasts
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact
Source: CNN

August CPI: Gasoline could subtract -0.60% MoM from CPI

Additionally, when August CPI is released on 9/13. And the US actually saw deflation in July CPI, aided by gasoline which subtracted -0.40% MoM.

  • the latest analysis by our data science team, led by tireless Ken
  • shows gasoline is set to subtract -0.60% MoM from August CPI
  • this is above the -0.40% MoM impact in July
  • this would strengthen the “disinflation” view
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

Further declines in gasoline should also lower consumer inflation expectations

And perhaps most importantly, this should help contain consumer inflation expectations.

  • pushing down consumer inflation expectations is key to fighting inflation
  • U Mich shows that gasoline is a huge influence on consumer expectations for prices
  • this drop in gasoline
  • suggests that in the near term, there could be another 100bp drop in consumer price expectations to 3.8% or lower from 4.8%
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

This would bring consumer price expectations closer to the long-term average of 3.1% and more closely achieve the Fed target. As shown below:

  • the 20-year avg of 1-yr inflation is 3.1%
  • falling to 3.8% is approaching this target
  • and far better than 6% a few months ago
  • 5-10 year inflation expectations remain anchored at 2.9%
  • this is close to the 20-year average of 2.8%
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

STRATEGY: 2H rally view intact

Given the list of market worries above, the natural question is how is there a positive thesis on equities into 2H2022? Here is our take:

  • our continuing analysis shows leading indicators point to disinflationary/deflation
  • US corporates remain impressively resilient, enduring the pandemic global shutdown with cost discipline
  • and US corporates are weathering the inflation surge impressively as well
  • the US economy has managed to absorb rapid Fed rate hikes so far
  • and US economic relative positioning far stronger in 2022
  • US net beneficiary of higher energy prices, absolute and relative (US exports oil)
  • US is on-shoring assets = future competitive advantage
  • US has labor issues, but this will be solved by either automation or rise in workforce participation
  • investor sentiment is rock bottom and worse than GFC by some metrics
  • fixed income markets show far less inflation in swaps, etc
  • and while many believe “bonds are getting it wrong” including Fed officials
  • the drop in energy and housing and other indicators are supportive of this lower inflation outlook
  • hence, Fed could do far less tightening as the market is doing Fed’s work

Bottom line. We see 2H rally thesis intact.

STRATEGY: 2022 Bear market was 164 days, or 25% duration of prior bull

Our data science team put together the comparative duration of bull markets and bear markets, and the corresponding ratio:

  • since 1942, there have been 14 such cycles
  • median ratio of bear vs bull is 31%, meaning a bear market is roughly 1/3 duration
  • since 1982, this ratio is only 15%
  • in 2022, the preceding bull market was 651 days
  • the current bear market was 164 (using 6/16)
  • or 25% ratio
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

As seen below, this ratio is solidly within the ranges seen since 1982.

  • many investors think “more time” is needed for this bear market
  • but given the shortness of the preceding bull market 651 days versus 1,309 median
  • the corresponding bear market should also be shorter
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

BUY THE DIP REGIME: Stocks already saw fundamental capitulation

And we want to revisit the chart below, which looks at the internals of the S&P 500 — the % stocks >20% off their highs, aka % stocks in a bear market.

  • this figure surged to 73% on 6/17
  • this was only exceeded 3 times in the past 30 years
  • each of the 3 prior instances was the market bottom
  • we think this is the 4th instance
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

BUY THE DIP: forward returns strong

And stocks have the best forward returns when this figure exceeds 54% as shown below:

  • in 3M, 6M and 12M
  • the best decile for returns
  • is when this figure is oversold >54%
  • hence, buy the dip regime is in force
ISM prices decline points to future steep fall in PPI (like a rock). Remote-work creating same job posting in multiple cities (overstating tightness?) 2H rally thesis strained but still intact

STRATEGY: 2022 Bear market was 164 days, or 25% duration of prior bull

Our data science team put together the comparative duration of bull markets and bear markets, and the corresponding ratio:

  • since 1942, there have been 14 such cycles
  • median ratio of bear vs bull is 31%, meaning a bear market is roughly 1/3 duration
  • since 1982, this ratio is only 15%
  • in 2022, the preceding bull market was 651 days
  • the current bear market was 164 (using 6/16)
  • or 25% ratio
10 thoughts to suggest inflation could fall more like a rock than a feather. 42% of CPI components deflating off peak = inflation could fall faster than consensus expects.

As seen below, this ratio is solidly within the ranges seen since 1982.

  • many investors think “more time” is needed for this bear market
  • but given the shortness of the preceding bull market 651 days versus 1,309 median
  • the corresponding bear market should also be shorter
10 thoughts to suggest inflation could fall more like a rock than a feather. 42% of CPI components deflating off peak = inflation could fall faster than consensus expects.

BUY THE DIP REGIME: Stocks already saw fundamental capitulation

And we want to revisit the chart below, which looks at the internals of the S&P 500 — the % stocks >20% off their highs, aka % stocks in a bear market.

  • this figure surged to 73% on 6/17
  • this was only exceeded 3 times in the past 30 years
  • each of the 3 prior instances was the market bottom
  • we think this is the 4th instance
10 thoughts to suggest inflation could fall more like a rock than a feather. 42% of CPI components deflating off peak = inflation could fall faster than consensus expects.

BUY THE DIP: forward returns strong

And stocks have the best forward returns when this figure exceeds 54% as shown below:

  • in 3M, 6M and 12M
  • the best decile for returns
  • is when this figure is oversold >54%
  • hence, buy the dip regime is in force
10 thoughts to suggest inflation could fall more like a rock than a feather. 42% of CPI components deflating off peak = inflation could fall faster than consensus expects.

 _____________________________

33 Granny Shot Ideas: We performed our quarterly rebalance on 7/12. Full stock list here –> Click here

______________________________

Disclosures (show)

This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. FSI Subscription entitles the subscriber to 1 user, research cannot be shared or redistributed. For additional information, please contact your sales representative or FS Insight at fsinsight.com.

Analyst Certification (Reg AC)
Tom Lee, CFA, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report, hereby certifies that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his personal views, which have not been influenced by considerations of the firm’s business or client relationships. Neither I, nor a member of my household is an officer, director, or advisory board member of the issuer(s) or has another significant affiliation with the issuer(s) that is/are the subject of this research report. There is a possibility that we will from time to time have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research.
Conflicts of Interest

This research contains the views, opinions and recommendations of FS Insight. At the time of publication of this report, FS Insight does not know of, or have reason to know of any material conflicts of interest.

General Disclosures

FS Insight is an independent research company and is not a registered investment advisor and is not acting as a broker dealer under any federal or state securities laws.

FS Insight is a member of IRC Securities’ Research Prime Services Platform. IRC Securities is a FINRA registered broker-dealer that is focused on supporting the independent research industry. Certain personnel of FS Insight (i.e. Research Analysts) are registered representatives of IRC Securities, a FINRA member firm registered as a broker-dealer with the Securities and Exchange Commission and certain state securities regulators. As registered representatives and independent contractors of IRC Securities, such personnel may receive commissions paid to or shared with IRC Securities for transactions placed by FS Insight clients directly with IRC Securities or with securities firms that may share commissions with IRC Securities in accordance with applicable SEC and FINRA requirements. IRC Securities does not distribute the research of FS Insight, which is available to select institutional clients that have engaged FS Insight.

As registered representatives of IRC Securities our analysts must follow IRC Securities’ Written Supervisory Procedures. Notable compliance policies include (1) prohibition of insider trading or the facilitation thereof, (2) maintaining client confidentiality, (3) archival of electronic communications, and (4) appropriate use of electronic communications, amongst other compliance related policies.

FS Insight does not have the same conflicts that traditional sell-side research organizations have because FS Insight (1) does not conduct any investment banking activities, and (2) does not manage any investment funds.

This communication is issued by FS Insight and/or affiliates of FS Insight. This is not a personal recommendation, nor an offer to buy or sell nor a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial instruments or services. This material is distributed for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting or investment advice.
The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.
Intended for recipient only and not for further distribution without the consent of FS Insight.

This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but FS Insight does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to FS Insight and the analyst’s involvement (if any) with any of the subject companies of the research. All pricing is as of the market close for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, risk tolerance, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decision regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. Except in circumstances where FS Insight expressly agrees otherwise in writing, FS Insight is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice, including within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client website, fsinsight.com. Not all research content is redistributed to our clients or made available to third-party aggregators or the media. Please contact your sales representative if you would like to receive any of our research publications.

Copyright © 2025 FS Insight LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the prior written consent of FS Insight LLC.